tonyboloni wrote:All though I prefer to be called queer....since gay has become a target market group from everything from liquor to automobiles and real estate.
I refuse to be a "lifestyle".
I used to walk in the gay pride march...until it turned into a gay pride parade.
Before I come across as some sort of dour, crabby sourpuss I think pride parades/gay have a purpose...but I found a pride march a more powerful statement.
I usually go back and forth between assimilationist and isolationist. It's heterophobia that keeps me from being in isolationist. I have to admit if I could find a local, vegan, LGBT owned market I'd rather put my money in their pockets than the local national chain.
I hate the term
queer, whilst emotional and sexual orientation aren't lifestyle choices, electing which label is applied to you
is. For one thing, being lesbian, gay or bisexual is not a gender issue in the same way that being transgender (pan-gender, post-gender...) is, with the latter being mixed with intersex people at an arbitrary level. They are two very separate things. I am gay and I am not transphobic; I was a director of a LGBT charity for two years (and actually tried to get them to support asexual people as well, but they said no because "they don't have the same kind of problems"). I don't like the term
queer; it's artificial and a bit too "reclaiming insults as our own" for my liking.
I also don't like the term "pride" used in reference to LGBT[AUP] (aka Queer)... issues. How can you be proud of something and say it was not a choice at the same time? My objection, of course, is entirely linguistic, but never mind. I agree with you about the Pride March thing being a load of crap. Why am I supposed to feel Proud of a community that gets drunk and does a load of poppers in the middle of the day? How do silver hotpants show that gay men are normal "just like everyone else"?
Anyway, I am a gay vegan and I have a friend who is vegan and lesbian. So that's two.