by Lordmuppet » Sun Oct 02, 2011 6:33 pm
serious problems with exercise science aside ...
Phillips, S.M., D.R. Moore, and J.E. Tang. “A critical examination of dietary protein requirements, benefits, and excesses in athletes.” International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism 17 (2007): 58.
"Conclusions and Practical Recommendations
To attain peak levels of performance athletes clearly need to be aware of their dietary
intake of protein, as well as carbohydrate and a number of other micronutrients and
minerals. Highly detailed and refined guidelines for intakes, however, are likely to
be confusing for most athletes. Notwithstanding, it appears that emerging dietary
guidelines for protein are in the range of 1.2–1.6 g protein·kg–1·d–1. This level is
greater than the RDA, with the general recommendation that the RDA is a protein
intake designed simply to alleviate deficiency. More important, it is an intake that
appears, based on experimental evidence (mostly nitrogen balance), to be adequate
and more than sufficient. Should athletes aim to meet or exceed this intake? Quite
simply, in the absence of evidence suggesting that higher intakes are beneficial, it
is not yet possible to say that they will be beneficial."
JS - They think it will open the door to folk like LordMuppet campaigning for a threeway?