by Gelert » Tue Jul 21, 2009 7:12 pm
Not fourthed.
A crisp blow to the larynx is much more satisfying.
On topic, I find it a bit of a mixed bag - on the one hand, I'm with spug, they have turned to sin, and the wages of sin is death, if only in the metaphorical sense in this jurisdiction.
On the other, they represent someone who has given more thought to the situation and actually tried to do something about it by going vegan or vegetarian. Regardless of their quitting it, that alone is more progressive than most in the general public at the moment who probably don't give the matter second thought.
Equally, there are vegan diets which are unhealthy and unsustainable. The person may have been feeling unenergetic, lack of protein, yadda, because their diet wasn't up to scratch. Not because it was vegan, but because they hadn't set about it properly. Some friendly support and suggestions of where to get advice about how to do just that might be in order then.
The ultimate dilemma comes when a public figure, not necessarily a celebrity, but someone who uses their position to urge others to become vegan for say, environmental reasons while condemning it strongly on the basis of personal failure.
A free carbon-neutral holiday for two to Machynlleth to anyone who guesses correctly who I'm thinking of in this instance, return tickets as a bonus those who don't mention his name out of respect.