by skoptic » Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:14 pm
Yup - I do this (kind of). I remember even from when I was a kid, recovery speed was a key sign of fitness - although there were less gadgets back in them days.
Resting HR is interesting - but that should be your total lowest (60 is normal, but I bet you can get lower if you are totally rested, lying down etc. I'm usually 42). But the range and speed of recovery depends on what you're doing. A really hard interval run might take me to towards 93% WHR (working heart rate which is [max heart rate - resting heart rate]) and then get back to 60% WHR in 90 seconds.
It's all quite relative, but if you build up stats it can show you improvements. Like Fredrik says there can be a lot of influencing factors - but I judge my general fitness by HR during a run / bike session (or perceived effort if you are gadget less) rather than speed.