Moderators: hardcore iv, fredrikw, JP, Rochellita, bronco


vegieburger wrote:I'm overweight and sick of it. I have tried eating less and doing more cardio but all that seemed to happen was that I stopped making strength gains and I didn't really lose any weight. A friend has suggested that I do this diet where you eat 700cals a day for 2 weeks. I know that 700cals is may below my bmr but supposedly it takes more than 2 weeks of eating like this before your body uses muscles for fuel (I don't know if this is true or not) Even it doesn't reduce my muscles I realise that it will have a negative effect on my strength so my question is about how long would it take to gain strength back after 2 weeks of the diet? As I want to start competing in powerlifting I don't want to mess my strength up but if I can build my strength up reasonably quckly once I start eating more than I will give this diet a go.
how about some high intensity interval stuff on top of your weights? Drop the cardio if it is just low impact steady state perhaps?
Perhaps this might be counterproductive, considering you would be going into starvation mode, which makes your body burn fat slower If I'm not mistaken?
thestoatyone wrote:700kcal a day is daft. I wouldn't just be worried about losing strength but bone density and some other very important shit. Take a good luck at what you're eating and just trim it slightly. Throw in some metcon at the end of your workout and find little ways to get a bit more and you're laughing.
thestoatyone wrote:If that's you in the avatar pic though I say stop being a daft bint. You ain't overweight by a country mile. Focus on getting strong; awesomeness will follow.
baldy wrote:I know when I have been sick for a couple of days, and not been able to eat properly it takes a good 2 weeks to get back to full strength. Thats only having 2-3 days of sickness with probably about that amount of calories.
Plus mentally 2 weeks would seriously mess up your eating patterns/routine.
xJimx wrote:As others have said, what you're proposing sounds unnecessarily drastic and, potentially, damaging.
I've lost 20kg in the last few years just by being careful with portion control (especially where evening carbs are concerned) & cutting out 99% of the junk. I've done this with a bare minimum of cardio (which I hate with a passion) & have never 'dieted' to the extent I've felt hungry. I'm stronger now than I used to be & certainly look a hell of a lot better.
Talyn wrote:Is there a particular reason why you want to do it in two weeks? This is going to limit what you can achieve.
If calories = 700 and your maintenance is probably 2000, but lets say, 1700. Then you will have a daily deficit of 1000, over two weeks that's 14000. Best case scenario you lose all fat, generally 1kg of fat is 3500, so that's 4kg of fat. Worst case scenario you also lose some muscle and less than 4kg fat. Most likely scenario is you will just piss out a bunch of water weight due to the lack of carbohydrates and what-not, then as soon as you go back to maintenance you'll put it back on again.
I think you should consider a different approach. Or at least review the timeframe.

vegieburger wrote:in feb my dr told me I am overweight and suggested I take prescription appitite suppressents if I haven't lost any weight in 6 months and I am still the same weight (60 to 62kg) and same waist size now. I don't really want to take the appitite suppressents but they would be a last resort (I take medication that has been tested on animals if I have to but I don't want to support animal testing by taking something that I could avoid). It sounds stupid but I really don't know how overweight I am but my dr seems like the most objective person to ask.
muchluv wrote:Talyn, I am pretty sure it is 3500 calories for each pound of fat, not each kg. Just thought id mention it.
baldy wrote:First time I have ever heard of a Dr suggesting appitite suppressents, I always hear of Dr's telling people to stop taking them because they are so bad. Maybe this has changed.
muchluv wrote:Talyn, I am pretty sure it is 3500 calories for each pound of fat, not each kg. Just thought id mention it.
Vegieburger I would never consider you overweight from your picture, but I am sorry to hear you are having a tough time
How many calories do you consume each day at the moment, roughly, if you know?
Talyn wrote:VB: Fair enough, I just think you would be better with a more tapered approach. How much weight do you think you need to lose, btw?

vegieburger wrote:I thought I was about 62kg but I weighed myself today and I am 65, I want to lose about 10kg. Up until when I weighed myself I was ready to take a more tapered aproach and still focus primarily on strength gain but after seeing how much I really weigh I've decided to focus on losing weight. I love strength training but while I am overweight it will have to come second to losing weight. I'm not going to do the 700cals a day thing unless after 3 weeks of daily cardio and being strict with eating I haven't lost any weight.
Talyn wrote:Fair enough, but it can backfire. If you cut calories drastically you will most likely retain more water as a direct consequence, which will make the scales say no weight loss (or even weight gain), despite the fact you may be reducing fat/muscle. This can lead to a further reduction of calories or increase in exercise, and further down the spiral you go.
A tapered approach can help alleviate this... but the goal is yours.
Talyn wrote:To a certain extent, you need to just be happy with the way you are. You might refuse to accept that, but for your own headspace you should not start believing that you are inferior, or that by losing 10kg is all of a sudden going to make everything better.

Return to Vegan Diets, Nutrition and Healthy Eating
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests